Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,705

0 members and 1,705 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,138
Threads: 248,588
Posts: 2,569,088
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, BertsMum
Results 1 to 10 of 73

Threaded View

  1. #20
    BPnet Veteran Mendel's Balls's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-07-2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,073
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked 39 Times in 22 Posts
    Images: 40

    Re: I Attended the HR2811 Hearing on July 29th

    Quote Originally Posted by DutchHerp View Post
    I actually want to reword what I said earlier.

    In an ideal world, people would never have taken animals from the wild to put in cages, to keep as pets, etc. Hence, I said that ideally all animals that could cause problems would be banned.

    I'm not saying that's a solution. Banning pythons is definitely not the ideal solution, but if it's been a ban or no ban, I choose ban.

    I like the microchipping idea, but then again, an escaped python could already cause problems before capture.

    Don't get me wrong, I don't want a ban on pythons, even though it seems like I do.

    Between the two choices right now though, I choose ban.

    Later, Matt
    Seriously, I dont think anyone can even follow you anymore.....
    ~ 1.0.0 Python regius ~ Wild-type ~
    ~
    1.0.0 Canis familiaris ~ Blue Italian Greyhound ~

    ~ 0.0.9 Danio rerio~ Wild-type and Glofish




  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Mendel's Balls For This Useful Post:

    sweety314 (07-30-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1