Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 2,877

3 members and 2,874 guests
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,204
Threads: 248,615
Posts: 2,569,216
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, madballreptiles
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Threaded View

  1. #3
    Bogertophis's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-28-2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    20,361
    Thanks
    28,342
    Thanked 19,955 Times in 11,924 Posts

    Re: House Committee report includes Lacey Act amendments

    Quote Originally Posted by Homebody View Post
    I feel for the team that wrote this report. These are people that likely care a great deal about Chinese competition in the pharmaceutical industry. They wrote a report they were proud of, only to have their bosses demand that they include this utterly unrelated topic. It must have been so disheartening.
    I agree, & if it were up to me, that sort of nonsense would stop immediately. It makes no sense to sneak irrelevant things onto other legislation, just to force a vote on them when they otherwise wouldn't be passed at all. It shouldn't be legal to do this, IMO. It's both sneaky & lazy on the part of those doing this, neither of which is good.
    Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength.
    Eric Hoffer (1902 - 1983)

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Bogertophis For This Useful Post:

    Homebody (12-31-2023)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1