Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
Originally Posted by MarkS
I don't disagree with enforcing the rules, in fact I like the way the rules have been spelled out a little more clearly. What I disagree with is the public punishment idea where everyone can see how many times you've been dinged, but not what it was for.
Mark---- I hear you on the public punishment without explanation.
-Camp
0.0.1 Normal
0.1 Spider
"...and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him."
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
Originally Posted by daniel1983
Funny thing is that you have to post in order for this policy to effect you.
If you just kept your mouth shut, your infraction level would have been zero. But you chose to post therefore the rule effected you.
How is someone that posts rarely going to be greatly effected by a policy related to the manner in which people post? It should not concern them unless the few posts that they make each month are all inappropriate.
I don't understand the issue with the policy. It is no different than the previous methods used by moderators/admin. It is just a different way of keeping track of the infractions.
If you just kept your mouth shut, your infraction level would have been zero. But you chose to post therefore the rule effected you.
Originally Posted by MarkS
